Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 F.3d 793 - Schaefer v. Goch

Schaefer v. Goch’s Empirical Analysis

153 F.3d 793 · 1998

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
May 2021
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Young v. City of Mount Ranier (2001), Arar v. Ashcroft (2009)

19 federal appellate ·

2501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Graham v. Connor · Wolff v. McDonnell · Mapp v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]eliberate indifference, in fact, is merely the manifestation in certain situations of a more general inquiry, which is whether the government conduct at issue `shocks the conscience.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the sine qua non . . . is a purpose to cause harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “of culpability--that is, conduct that is more than negligent but less than intentional--can give rise to liability under the Fourteenth Amendment. Id. 32 As noted above, the Parents contend that the defendants failed to protect Young from a known and substantial risk of harm while he was in their custody and that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. These claims fall within the limited circumstances where conduct in the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.