Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

153 F.3d 925

Docket No. 93-50281.

United States v. Keys

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 20, 1998.

Amended April 29, 1998.

Decided Second Amendment Sept. 21, 1998.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1998-09-21

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Silva v. Woodford (2002), United States of America v. Calvin Wayne Buckland (2002)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

210199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The motion of the United States to reinstate additional portions of the three-judge panel opinion reported at 67 F.3d 801 (9th Cir.1995) is GRANTED. For this limited purpose the mandate is ordered recalled. The Opinion filed January 20, 1998, appearing at 133 F.3d 1282 (9th Cir.1998) and amended at 143 F.3d 479 (9th Cir.1998), to include a new footnote, is hereby amended. Footnote # 1, 133 F.3d at 1286, is now augmented to include Parts I and IIA of the panel opinion. With this amendment, Footnote # 1, shall read as follows:

1/ Because we now affirm Keys’s conviction of perjury, we reinstate and reaffirm the parts of the original three-judge panel opinion rejecting entirely his claims of substantive and sentencing error, specifically Parts I, IIA, C, and D.

¶2With this amendment, the mandate shall reissue forthwith.

/153/f3d/925 · .json · Public domain