Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

153 Fla. 164

14 So.2d 267

Dear v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1943

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1943-06-15

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“(1) A violation of the terms of parole may render the parolee liable to arrest and a return to prison to serve out the term for which he was sentenced. (2) An offender whose parole is revoked may, at the discretion of the commission, be credited with any portion of the time he has satisfactorily served on parole.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Gibbs v. Wainwright, 413 F. Supp. 850 - Lashley v. State of Fla.

“"Parole and gained time is granted by the sovereign as a matter of grace rather than right. The obvious purpose is to encourage the wrongdoer to amend his ways and relieve the state of added responsibility for his care. The state may offer such grace under and subject to conditions as it may consider most conducive to accomplish the desired purpose. * * *"”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Shattuck v. Grider

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1943-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1980

12 state decisions

8019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ADAMS, J.:

¶1 Petitioner seeks discharge by habeas corpus from serving the remainder of a five year sentence dated June 16, 1939. He contends that by virtue of Sec. 954.06, Fla. Stat. 1941, granting him gain time he served the sentence within three years, six months and nine days. By his petition and exihibit attached, it appears that at one time he was out on parole and had same revoked. Despite this he claims the benefit of the gained time because he acquired a vested right to it under the statute and misconduct thereafter occurring could not deprive him of it.

¶2 Parole and gained time is granted by the sovereign as a matter of grace rather than of right. The obvious purpose is to encourage the wrongdoer to mend his ways and relieve the state of added responsibility for his care. The state may offer such grace under and subject to such conditions as it may consider most conducive to accomplish the desired purpose. • Our statute plainly provides that a violation of parole shall subject the parolee to “serve out the term for which he was sentenced.” Sec. 947.21, Fla. Stat. 1941. A similar statute was before the Circuit Court of Appeals in Halligan, Warden v. Marcil, 208 Fed. 403, wherein that Court reached the same conclusion that we have.

¶3 It appears from the record before us that petitioner is not illegally detained and the writ is denied.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., concur.
/153/fla/164 · .json · Public domain