Murray v. Stuckey's Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2013
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 216
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Hickman v. Taylor · Blum v. Stenson · Searle v. Simon · United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“resisted plaintiffs' fee claim both on the basis of the number of hours claimed and the hourly rate applied”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.