Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 FRD 660 - Ryall v. Appleton Electric Co.

Ryall v. Appleton Electric Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · Upjohn Company v. United States · United States v. Nobles · Hearn v. Rhay · Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) assertion of the privilege was a result of some affirmative act, such as filing suit, by the asserting party; (2) through this affirmative act, the asserting party put the protected information at issue by making it relevant to the case; and (3) application of the privilege would have denied the opposing party access to information vital to his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.