Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 FSUPP 62 - Bucholz v. Hutton

Bucholz v. Hutton’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
11
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2021

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions — followed in 11 states

8019571960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Koster v. Lumbermens Mut Casualty Co · Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. · Hess v. Pawloski · Wuchter v. Pizzutti · Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““53-204. Service of process, how made — fees. Service of such summons or process under section [s] 53-202 and 53-203 shall be made by leaving a copy thereof with a fee of five dollars ($5.00) with the secretary of state of the state of Montana, or in his office, and such service shall be sufficient and valid personal service upon the defendant. “Provided, that notice of such service and a copy of the summons or process is forthwith sent by registered mail requiring personal delivery, by the plaintiff to the defendant and the defendant’s return receipt and plaintiff’s affidavit of compliance herewith are appended to the process and entered as a part of the return thereof;””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.