Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 Ga. App. 430 - Barnett v. State

153 Ga. App. 430 - Barnett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably White v. State (1984), E.K. Wilcox, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. J. Paul Ford, Warden, Cross-Appellee (1987)

3 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

310198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 85 Ga. App. 119 - Anthony v. State · 122 Ga. App. 553 - Miller v. State · Redwine v. State · 136 Ga. App. 54 - Vaughn v. State · 65 Ga. App. 840 - White v. Executive Committee of the Baptist Convention

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts shall not only be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but shall exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To warrant a conviction based solely on fingerprint evidence, the fingerprints corresponding to those of the defendant must have been found in the place where the crime was committed, and under such circumstances that they could only have been impressed at the time when the crime was committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.