Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 Ill. App. 3d 891 - People v. Dace

153 Ill. App. 3d 891 - People v. Dace’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 165 Ill. 2d 445 - People v. Mahaffey (1995), 257 Ill. App. 3d 792 - People v. Reynolds (1994)

27 state decisions

1101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · 73 Ill. 2d 7 - People v. Precup · 40 Ill. 2d 109 - The People v. Stoval · 67 Ill. 2d 127 - People v. Coslet · 66 Ill. 2d 162 - People v. Kester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that the knowledge of one member of a law firm is imputed to other members of the firm____ A conflict of interest for one member of a firm extends to all members of a firm____ In a case where two members of a firm represent clients with conflicting interests, it can only be concluded that you have a situation where the same attorney is representing both clients. In the instant case attorney Markese’s relationship as counsel for [prosecution witness] Moffett and his knowledge of his client’s case must be imputed to attorney Kielian, who represented the defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.