Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 IND 1 - State v. Darlington

State v. Darlington’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb (2001), Roth v. Local Union No. 1460 of Retail Clerks Union (1939)

28 state decisions

801899190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Legler v. Paine · Hoover v. Wood · State v. Aydelott · State ex rel. McCay v. Krost · Bowles v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “courts will not pass upon a constitutional question, and decide a statute to be invalid, unless a decision upon that very point becomes necessary to the determination of the cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.