Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 KAN 420 - Barrett v. McMannis

Barrett v. McMannis’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 1973
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1973

16 state decisions

1001941195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Newell v. McMillan · Ayers v. Graff · McNutt v. Nellans · Eisenhour v. Cities Service Oil Co. · Hart-Parr Co. v. Chambers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Even though the method followed be held irregular, the probate court had jurisdiction, and its judgment may not be collaterally attacked.” (p. 424.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.