Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 KAN 661 - Davidson v. Shaffer

Davidson v. Shaffer’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
December 1953
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shoemake v. Davis · Yeager v. Graham · Associated Piping & Engineering Co. v. Jones · Huston v. Cox · Boreing v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Sharing of losses? Yes, one will lose his money and the other his work if the project is a failure. Sharing of profits? Yes, if the venture is successful and there are profits to be shared. There is nothing in the decided cases nor in the textbooks which says that the sharing of profits and losses in a partnership or joint adventure must be the same in kind. Fairly considered, we think the agreement between plaintiff and defendant implied such a sharing of profits and losses, and was essentially a joint adventure.” (p. 912.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.