Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 Me. 79 - White v. Schofield

White v. Schofield’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 1982
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1982

14 state decisions

801957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jordan v. Portland Coach Co. · Esponette v. Wiseman · Bradford v. Davis · Greaves v. Houlton Water Co. · Fernald v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rules of Court are designed primarily to implement procedural statutes, discourage procrastination on the part of litigants and their counsel, and provide a smooth and orderly flow of litigation. They are not to be so interpreted as arbitrarily to destroy rights of appeal and review.” White v. Schofield, 153 Me. 79, 83 ; 134 A. (2nd) 755, 757.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.