Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 MINN 27 - Klessig v. Lea

Klessig v. Lea’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
December 1985
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1985

16 state decisions

701922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thysell v. McDonald · Daily v. St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. · Beneke v. Estate of Beneke · Knight v. Martin · Dickson v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are of the opinion that the making of this deed and what occurred in connection therewith is altogether of too uncertain and ambiguous a character to be allowed as a fact or circumstance from which a jury might infer an implied agreement to pay appellant for services rendered long prior thereto. What was said in Beneke v. Estate of Beneke, 119 Minn. 441 , 138 N. W. 689 , Ann. Cas. 1914B, 381, about evidence of such .uncertain bearing holds true here.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.