Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 MINN 66 - Eberhart v. Eberhart

Eberhart v. Eberhart’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
10
states following
February 1985
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 1985 · most notably State of Illinois Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sterling (1956), Zirkle v. Zirkle (1930)

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions — followed in 10 states

901922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jacobs v. Jacobs · Eberhart v. Eberhart · Hartigan v. Hartigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The plaintiff has taken the child from the jurisdiction of the court. So long as she keeps him without the jurisdiction the defendant should be relieved from the payment of support money to accrue in the future and that already accrued should not be enforced against him.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.