Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 Miss. 696 - Eady v. State

Eady v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1952
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1952

8 state decisions

601929193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mars v. Germany · Butler v. State · Hatto v. Brooks · Wilson v. Stark · Lusk v. Seal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is rarely the case that this court will notice, on a suggestion of error, a new contention, one not assigned or argued on the submission of the case. As a general rule it is no more permissible on appeal to present a case in halves or by piece-meal than it would be on the original trial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.