Belverd v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Long v. Branham · Callaham v. Arenson · Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc. · 18 N.C. App. 371 - Franzle v. Waters · Smith v. Privette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n] either paragraph one nor paragraph thirteen is, on its own, ambiguous. However, in terms of whether a lot may be used for a through-street, paragraphs one and thirteen conflict with each other. Paragraph one would prohibit the use of a lot for a public through-street since such use is clearly not “residential”. . . . Paragraph thirteen, on the other hand, would allow such use if the Mileses gave written consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Erthal v. May
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.