Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 N.C. App. 565 - In Re Faircloth

153 N.C. App. 565 - In Re Faircloth’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
3
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

65 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Santosky v. Kramer · Matter of Montgomery · 142 N.C. App. 607 - In Re Blackburn · 123 N.C. App. 434 - Matter of Oghenekevebe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a party requests such a recusal by the trial court, the party must demonstrate objectively that grounds for disqualification actually exist. The requesting party has the burden of showing through substantial evidence that the judge has such a personal bias, prejudice or interest that he would be unable to rale impartially. If there is sufficient force to the allegations contained in a recusal motion to proceed to find facts, or if a reasonable man knowing all of the circumstances would have doubts about the judge’s ability to rale on the motion to recuse in an impartial manner, the trial judge should either recuse himself or refer the recusal motion to another judge.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A termination of parental rights hearing is a civil rather than criminal action, with the right to be present, to testify, and to confront witnesses subject to `due limitations.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An adjudicatory hearing on abuse and neglect allegations is not a condition precedent to a termination hearing. . . . [S]uch a hearing on abuse and neglect may well [be] merely redundant with parts of [a] termination hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.