153 N.C. App. 701 - State v. Motley’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Edwards · Crane v. Stern · State v. Steen · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he question of whether consent to a search was in fact `voluntary' or was the product of duress or coercion, expressed or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“recognized as a special situation excepted from the warrant requirement, and a search is not unreasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when lawful consent to the search is given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.