State v. Jamerson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Locurto (1999), Sippio v. State (1998)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. MacOn · State v. Kelly · State v. Vestal · State v. Reyes · State v. Michaels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“describ[ed] the physical properties of the implement that caused the [victims' injuries and] death[ ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“an issue which is peculiarly within the jury's ken,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“(1) the intended testimony must concern a subject matter that is beyond the ken of the average juror; (2) the field testified to must be at a state of the art such that an expert's testimony could be sufficiently reliable; and (3) the witness must have sufficient expertise to offer the intended testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.