State v. Eisenman’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2017
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Halper · Bibby v. United States · Hudson v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · Doe v. Poritz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q. All right, the indictment charges on escape, March 26, 1993 you did commit the crime of escape by absconding from parole that was imposed three different times, September 25, [19]87 and December 4, [19]87 and November 18, [19]88. Tell me what happened? [A.] I was released on parole to the Institute of Human Development Drug Program. I was there for about 31 days. I was on a furlough. I came back several hours late. They said they were going to dismiss me from that program and that they, I guess, notified my parole officer at which time I packed and left. Q. You left. Did you ever contact your parole officer after that? A. No, sir. Q. How long were you supposed to be there? A. They said a year. Q. A year. And how long were you there? A. Thirty-one days, approximately that. Q. And then you had no contact with anybody in parole until you were picked up in May? A. Correct. Q. And that is when you were picked up on the Garden State Parkway? A. Yes. [ Id. at 471 , 710 A. 2d 441 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because defendant's thefts, first of the Chrysler van, then of the Isuzu Trooper, and finally of the Mercedes and the Jeep, clearly were independent crimes committed at different times in separate places and affecting separate victims the imposition of three consecutive tenyear suspensions could constitute a proper exercise of the sentencing court's discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e are satisfied that defendant's answers to the court's questions were minimally sufficient to establish a factual basis from which the court could conclude that defendant purposefully avoided parole supervision after leaving the Institute of Human Development Drug Program. [ Ibid. ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.