State v. O'Herron’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2004
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Johnson v. United States · Sedillo v. United States · United States v. Chadwick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clash between the concepts of `plain view' and `reasonable expectation of privacy.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Here the marijuana plants were located in defendants' backyard but were observed from adjoining property, and the officers' intrusion onto defendants' property is sought to be justified solely on the basis of the antecedent observation. [1] The State urges in essence that whatever is lawfully observed without a warrant may be seized without a warrant, regardless of its location. We find that position to be without the support of reason or persuasive authority. In the kind of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. O'Herron“observation and subsequent seizure require no warrant, as where the initial lawful intrusion is by consent ( e.g., State v. Braeunig, 122 N.J. Super. 319 (App. Div. 1973); State v. Mark, 46 N.J. 262 (1966)), to effect an arrest ( e.g., State v. Jordan, 115 N.J. Super. 73 (App. Div. 1971), certif. den. 59 N.J. 293 (1971)), or in hot pursuit ( e.g., State v. Canola, 135 N.J. Super. 224 (App. Div. 1975), mod., 73 N.J. 206 (1977)). On the other hand, objects may come into”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. O'Herron
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.