Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 NW2D 895 - State v. Bauer

State v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1987

9 state decisions

60196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. McClelland · State v. Higgins · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"An appeal may be taken by the state from: ..... "4. An order made after judgment affecting any substantial right of the state."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Thus it is clear that the trial anew in the district court, on an appeal from the judgment entered by the county justice in a criminal action, does not contemplate that an information be filed but that trial shall be had upon the complaint filed in the county justice’s court. A public offense, where a trial may be had in justice, police, or county court, is excepted from the statute requiring prosecution by information or indictment. Section 29-01-01, N.D.C.C. “For these reasons, we will consider the order entered by the district court as one dismissing the complaint as contemplated by Section 33-12-40, N.D.C.C. “A motion to quash is made applicable by statute only to an information or an indictment. Section 29-14-01, N.D.C.C. It is not made applicable to a complaint.” State v. Bauer, 153 N.W.2d 895, 896 (N.D.1967).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The supreme court, except as otherwise provided in this constitution, shall have appellate jurisdiction only, which shall be coextensive with the state and shall have a general superintending control over all inferior courts under such regulations and limitations as may be prescribed by law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.