Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 Ohio App. 3d 44 - State v. Coe

153 Ohio App. 3d 44 - State v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably State v. Cooper (2007), State v. Dickess (2008)

59 state decisions

390200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because `a conviction based on legally insufficient evidence constitutes a denial of due process,' * * * a conviction based upon insufficient evidence would almost always amount to plain error.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The weight accorded an inference is fact-dependent and can be disregarded as speculative only if reasonable minds can come to the conclusion that the inference is not supported by the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.