Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 Ohio App. 3d 752 - Miley v. STS Systems, Inc.

153 Ohio App. 3d 752 - Miley v. STS Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2024

16 state decisions

90200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Patton v. Diemer · 69 Ohio App. 2d 40 - Grant v. Ivy · In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Taxes · Samson Sales, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the appropriate recourse for challenging a void judgment that is encumbered by a jurisdictional defect is to file a common-law motion to vacate based upon the inherent power of a trial court to set aside a judgment”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he authority to vacate a void judgment is not derived from Civ. R. 60(B) but rather constitutes an inherent power possessed by Ohio courts”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * A court lacks personal jurisdiction to enter a default judgment against a defendant where effective service of process has not been made upon the defendant and the defendant has not appeared in the case or otherwise waived service. * * * Absent proper service, the trial court lacks jurisdiction to enter a judgment, and if a judgment is nevertheless rendered, it is a nullity and void ab initio. * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.