153 Ohio St. 3d 497 - State v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
392
cited by 392 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited
392 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Bradley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 392 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[l]aw-enforcement officers may testify to out-of-court statements for the nonhearsay purpose of explaining the next investigatory step.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holtman · State v. Villani“(1) the conduct to be explained is relevant, equivocal, and contemporaneous with the statements, (2) the probative value of the statements is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, and (3) the statements do not connect the accused with the crime charged.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holtman · State v. Villani“[a]t the time of imposing sentence, the court shall * * * address the defendant personally and ask if he or she wishes to make a statement in his or her own behalf or present any information in mitigation of punishment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · Columbus v. Fabich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.