Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 So. 3d 1050 - Veroline v. Priority One EMS

153 So. 3d 1050 - Veroline v. Priority One EMS’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Ekundayo v. Brenham State School · 758 So. 2d 782 - Gibson v. State · State ex rel. R.L.K. · 774 So. 2d 1022 - Darbonne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]he only time [the trial court's decision to accept the opinion of one expert and to reject that of another] will be deemed manifestly erroneous is when the court was clearly wrong in accepting the expert's opinion on which it relied.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.