Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 SO3D 561 - Tatum v. Shroff

Tatum v. Shroff’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · 977 So. 2d 880 - Samaha v. Rau · Tillman v. Eldridge · Foster v. Patwardhan · Foster v. Patwardhan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “potentially insures or precludes recovery, affects a litigant's ultimate success, or determines the outcome of the legal dispute,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiff's cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.