153 S.W. 326
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 29, 1913
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1913-01-29
<p>Bail (§ 65*) — Recognizance on Appeal — Recitals.</p> <p>The recognizance not stating, as required by the statute, the amount of the punishment, the appeal must, on motion, be dismissed.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bail, Cent. Dig. §.285; Dec. Dig. § 65.*]</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1922
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Dismissed · Decided 1913-01-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1On motion of the Assistant Attorney General, the appeal in this ease must be dismissed. The recognizance is insufficient, in that it fails to state the amount of the punishment. The statute requires that this shall be done.
¶2For the reason indicated, the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.