Everett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 1983
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 115 Tex. Crim. 189 - Arnold v. State · De Long v. State · 105 Tex. Crim. 91 - Loyd v. State · 117 Tex. Crim. 201 - Harris v. State · 103 Tex. Crim. 140 - McVerse v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An agreement of parties to act together in a common design can seldom be proven by words, but reliance can often be had on the actions of the parties showing an understanding and common design to do a certain act.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mills v. State · Pena v. State““Participation in an enterprise may be inferred from circumstances and need not be shown by direct evidence. Any person who advises or agrees to the commission of an offense and who is present when it is committed, is a principal, whether he aids in its commission or not. The mere fact of presence is not sufficient, however, but is a circumstance tending to prove that a person is a principal, and, taken with other facts, may be sufficient to show that he was a participant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pena v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.