Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 U.S. 177 - Erhardt v. Steinhardt

Erhardt v. Steinhardt’s Empirical Analysis

153 U.S. 177 · 1894

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024

1 state decisions

2018941900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “313. Cordials, liquors, arrack, absinthe, kirschwasser, ratafia, and other similar spirituous beverages or bitters, containing spirits, and not specially enumerated or provided for in this act, two dollars per proof gallon. [Italics ours.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “steeping in alcohol or strong spirit bitter herbs,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.