Hanrick v. Hanrick’s Empirical Analysis
153 U.S. 192 · 1894
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 19 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2011 · most notably Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Martin (1900), Postal Telegraph Cable Co v. State of Alabama (1894)
36 federal appellate · 19 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Tennessee v. Union & Planters' Bank · Barney v. Latham · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Torrence v. Shedd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any oilier suit of a civil nature, at law or in equity, of wliicli tiie circuit courts of the United States are given jurisdiction by the preceding section, and which are now pending, or which may hereafter be brought, in any state «ourf, may be removed into the circuit court of the United States for tlie proper district by the defendant or defendants therein, being non-residents of that state. And when in any suit mentioned in this section there shall be a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different states, and which can be fully determined as between them, then either one or more of the defendants actually interested in snch controversy may remove said suit into the circuit court of the United States for the proper district.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"But, in order to justify such removal on the ground of a separate controversy between citizens of different states, there must, by the very terms of the statute, be a controversy ‘which can be fully determined as between them’; and, by the settled construction of this section, the whole subject-matter of the suit must he capable of being finally determined as between them, and complete relief afforded as to the separate cause of action, without the presence of others originally made parties to the suit””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thurber v. Miller“The present case was a suit for partition, to which all the plaintiffs and all the defendants were indispensable parties. Torrence v. Shedd, 144 U.S. 527 , 12 S.Ct. 726 [36 L.Ed. 528]; De la Vega v. League, 64 Tex. 205; Stark v. Carroll, 66 Tex. 393, 1 S.W. 188.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.