Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 WASHAPP 235 - State v. Fry

State v. Fry’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thomas · State in Interest of JRT v. Timperly · 110 Wash. 2d 128 - Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM. · State v. Goodman · Homer v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “throughout the morning of July 3 because Mr. Fry had struck her. Report of Proceedings (RP) (Sept. 8, 2008) at 105. The court instructed the jury on second degree assault and on the lesser-included offense of third degree assault. It listed the elements of third degree assault as follows: (1) Mr. Fry caused Ms. Fry bodily harm; (2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in her dictionary at home and brought the dictionary to deliberations but did not share the definition or dictionary with the other jurors until after the jury delivered its verdict to the bailiff. The juror said that this definition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The prosecutor related this information to the court by affidavit. And Mr. Fry moved for a new trial based on juror misconduct. ¶ 6 The trial court held a hearing. The juror testified that she looked up the word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.