State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · 54 Wash. 2d 570 - Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc. · Tucker v. Fischbein · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 30 Wash. App. 119 - State v. Eppens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that are insufficient to invalidate a charging document. Only section .050 addresses the statute of limitations. It provides that an information is sufficient if it can be understood therefrom that the crime was committed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Walker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.