153 Wis. 2d 697 - State v. Kimpel’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State · 135 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Friedrich · 117 Wis. 2d 159 - State v. Sonnenberg · 66 Wis. 2d 736 - Werner v. State · 149 Wis. 2d 132 - State v. Oberlander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the evidence must have come to the moving party's knowledge after the trial; (2) the moving party must not have been negligent in seeking to discover it; (3) the evidence must be material to the issue; (4) the testimony must not be merely cumulative to the testimony that was introduced at trial; and (5) it must be reasonably probable that a different result would be reached on a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, whether due process requires a new trial because of newly-discovered evidence is a constitutional question subject to independent review[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smiley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.