Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 A3D 1199 - In re Cameron B.

In re Cameron B.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re M.B. · In Re Michaela C. · Guardianship of Hailey M. · In re I.S. · In re C.P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only if there is no competent evidence in the record to support it, if the fact-finder clearly misapprehends the meaning of the evidence, or if the finding is so contrary to the credible evidence that it does not represent the truth and right of the case.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to establish safe, long-term care for a child who is the subject of a child protection proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen it is appropriate, ... allows parents whose children cannot be returned to them to have a meaningful opportunity to maintain a legal relationship with their children and to have the court determine their rights to have contact with their children.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.