Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 A3D 925 - State v. Oscar Muralles

State v. Oscar Muralles’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mattatall · State v. Texieira · State v. Imbruglia · State v. Morales · State v. Guerra

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his Court will not overturn a trial justice's determination with regard to such a motion unless we determine that the trial justice committed clear error or that he or she 'overlooked or misconceived material and relevant evidence [relating] to a critical issue in the case.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if he or she has articulated sufficient reasoning in support of the ruling.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If the trial justice 'does not agree with the jury verdict or does not agree that reasonable minds could differ,' then he or she must embark on a fourth analytical step in order to 'determine whether the verdict is against the fair preponderance of the evidence and fails to do substantial justice.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.