Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 A3D 939 - CACH, LLC v. Brandon Potter

CACH, LLC v. Brandon Potter’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on DeMarco v. Travelers Insurance Co. · Inleasing Corp. v. Jessup · Faerber v. Cavanagh · Wachsberger v. Pepper · Urena v. Theta Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has been our consistent holding that arbitration is an affirmative defense and that 'a defending party seeking arbitration must specifically plead the right to arbitrate in its answer or the defense will be deemed waived.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “accord[s] great deference to the decision by a hearing justice to grant or deny a motion to amend and will not disturb his [or her] decision unless he [or she] abused his [or her] discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “mere delay is not enough to deny the amendment[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.