Mark Robar v. Albert Robar’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morris v. D'AMARIO · Cicilline v. Almond · City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers' District Council · Cullen v. Tarini · Board of Governors for Higher Education v. Infinity Construction Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'a determination of mootness does not always preclude judicial review,' and that we exercise our discretion in considering cases that are 'of extreme public importance, which are capable of repetition but which evade review.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a case is moot if the original complaint raised a justiciable controversy, but events occurring after the filing have deprived the litigant of a continuing stake in the controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]e generally decline to address moot cases because without the presence of a justiciable case or controversy, judicial power is at its weakest ebb.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.