People v. Carlesi’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2004
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte Garland · 10 E.H. Smith 541 - People v. . Sickles · People Ex Rel. Cosgriff v. . Craig · 14 E.H. Smith 217 - Roberts v. . the State · In the Matter of ____, an Attorney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The pardon in this case merely restored the defendant to his civil rights. If it had been granted before his term of imprisonment had been served, it would also have relieved the defendant of that. But it did not obliterate the record of his conviction or blot out the fact that he had been convicted. Matter of..........................., an Attorney, 86 N. Y. 563 . It relieved the defendant of the consequences which the law attached to his offense. But the defendant is to be punished now solely in consequence of his second offense. The fact of the former conviction is an element merely in determining the criminality of the second offense(Italics ours.) People v. Carlesi, 139 N. Y. Supp. 309, 313 , 29 N. Y. Crim. 35 (affirmed, 208 N. Y. 547 , 101 N. E. 1114 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.