Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 ALA 117 - Royal v. Goss

Royal v. Goss’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
6
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 1989 · most notably Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Pack (1973), Forest Investment Corp. v. Commercial Credit Corp. (1960)

29 state decisions

60190719101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kennedy's Heirs v. Kennedy's Heirs · Moog v. Strang · Rogers v. Adams · Robertson v. Bradford · Garner, Neville & Co. v. Leverett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The whole doctrine involved in reference to the rescissions of contracts for fraud and duress is based largely on the provisions governing rescission as an equitable remedy. The substantial difference is that a court of equity decrees rescission or cancellation upon certain terms which require the party seeking relief to do equity, and which it can do, whether the party has restored or offered to restore the consideration or not, and which has been held not to be a condition precedent for relief; whereas, in a court of law the court only has the power to enforce or annul the contract and cannot compel a restoration of the consideration as a condition to relief, and a complaining party must therefore voluntarily put the other party in statu quo as a condition precedent to relief.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.