Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

154 Ala. 391

Shehane v. Caraway

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1908

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1908-01-21

Heard before Hon. W. L. Park. Bill by S. J. Caraway, administrator, against Fanny Shehane, et al., to enforce a vendor’s lien. From a decree for complainants, respondents appeal. The failure to appoint a guardian ad litem for the infant defendants, must work a reversal in this case.- — Sec. 17, Code 1896; Ilibler v. Sproiol, 71 Ala. 50; Griffith v. Ventress, 91 Ala. 366; Barker v. Parker, 99 Ala. 239. Counsel discuss assignments of error, but cite no authority.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1968

1 state decisions

Relies on Griffith v. Ventress

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Beversed and remanded · Decided 1908-01-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HARALSON, J.

¶1The bill in this cause was filed to enforce a vendor’s lien against the widow and minor child of the deceased vendee.

¶2Under the statute of descent and distribution, the legal title to the land descended to the children; and in order to subject the land to the lien it was necessary that *392they be represented by a guardian ad litem. Indeed the complainant could not subject their legal estate to sale, in the absence of their being property before the court. — Griffith v. Ventress, 91 Ala. 366, 8 South. 312, and authorities there cited. The answer to the bill filed in behalf of the respondent minors cannot be considered, for the reason that no one had authority to make it for them, no guardian ad litem having been appointed.

¶3What their defenses may be is purely conjectural, and therefore the determination of any right which was asserted in the answer and cross-bill found in the record would be wholly gratuitous.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

Tyson, C. J., and Simpson and Denson, JJ., concur.
/154/ala/391 · .json · Public domain