State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chimel v. California · South Dakota v. Opperman · United States v. Chadwick · Frye v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“incidental administrative step.” Inventory searches may not be conducted for the purpose of discovering evidence of a crime. It is apparent that the diary reading was aimed at obtaining evidence rather than inventorying appellant's property. The search, therefore, was not justified under that exception to the search warrant requirement. Id. 742 P.2d at 1361 (citation omitted); Khoury, 901 F.2d at 958 (subsequent warrantless inspection of a diary following valid inventory constitutes violation of Fourth Amendment). 12 . The State argues that Sergeant Stauber's search was a valid”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. D'ANTORIO v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.