Frank v. State

Decided December 21, 1908

California Supreme Court · decided 1908-12-21

<p>Montgomery Avenue Bonds — Case Affirmed, — Judgment affirmed on the authority of Union Trust Company v. State of California, ante, p. 716.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1924

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1908-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SLOSS, J.

¶1The plaintiff, as holder of sixty-five Montgomery Avenue bonds and 2,975 coupons, sues to recover the amount of said bonds and coupons from the state of California. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant upon the sustaining of its demurrer to the complaint.

¶2The complaint is in all substantial particulars identical with that in Union Trust Company of San Francisco against the State of California, Sacramento No. 1570, ante p. 716, [99 Pac. 183], decided this day, and for the reasons stated -in the •opinion in that ease it must be held that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

Angellotti, J., Shaw, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Melvin, J., concurred.