Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 Colo. 231 - Hailpern v. Dryden

Hailpern v. Dryden’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2017

2 district · 7 state decisions

40196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carpenter v. Hill · McNeely v. Philadelphia National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where an alleged mistake of fact is but a contingency which the parties foresaw was liable to arise from their want of personal knowledge, such contingency forming a basis, in part, of the contract, it is not a ground for rescission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.