In re Baxter & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
154 F. 22 · 1907
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 1979 · most notably Lewis v. Baune (1976), Gordon v. Shirley Duke Associates (1979)
14 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Central Railroad Banking Co of Georgia v. Pettus · Union Nat Bank of Chicago v. Bank of Kansas City · Brine v. Insurance Co. · Meriwether Clark v. Andrew Smith · Etheridge v. Sperry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Sec. 475. Attorney’s Lien in Action or Special Proceeding. — From the commencement of an action or special proceeding, or the service of an answer containing a counterclaim, the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his client’s cause of action, claim, or counterclaim, which attaches to a verdict, report, decision, judgment or final order in his client’s favor, and the proceeds thereof in whosoever hands they may come; and the lien cannot be affected by any settlement between the parties before or after judgment or .final order. The court upon the petition of the client or attorney may determine and enforce the lien.” Judiciary Law (Consol. Laws N. Y. e. 30).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“be treated as one establishing a substantive right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.