Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 F.1d 481 - Marks v. Gates

Marks v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis

154 F. 481 · 1907

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 1995

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

501907191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O'Neil v. State of Vermont · Willard v. Tayloe · Pope Manuf'G Co v. Gormully · 7 E.H. Smith 596 - Cooley v. . Lobdell · Mississippi and Missouri Railroad Company v. Cromwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The enforcement of a contract by a decree for its specific performance rests in the sound discretion of the court — a judicial discretion to be exercised in accordance with established principles of equity. A contract may be valid in law and not subject to cancellation in equity, and yet the terms thereof, the attendant circumstances, and in some cases the subsequent events, may be such as to require the court to deny its specific performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.