Seifried v. Chatz’s Empirical Analysis
154 F.2d 1008 · 1946
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1964
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. Evans · Lockhart v. Garden City Bank & Trust Co. · Miners Sav. Bank v. Joyce · Crystal v. Green Point Sav. Bank · Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘We are forced to conclude in view of such authorities that a court is without right to allow fees or expenses except where they have been earned or incurred in connection with the formation of a plan of reorganization which has been, theoretically at least, of benefit to all parties in interest.’ ” (Emphasis mine.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.