Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 F.2d 13 - Maghan v. Young

Maghan v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

154 F.2d 13 · 1946

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
5
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Selph v. Council of Los Angeles (1979), Maryland Casualty Co. v. Conner (1967)

29 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

13019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burke v. Canfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Shortly after the adoption of the new Rules we did grant relief in a somewhat similar case, on the ground that the Rules were new and that it was unlikely counsel had sufficiently acquainted themselves with their terms, but we were careful on that occasion to advise the Bar that we intended thereafter to exercise sparingly our discretion to save an appeal prosecuted in disregard of the Rules.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “professionally engaged in attending to other matters”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.