In re Martin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““2. The method of producing stabilized low viscosity lubricating oils from relatively high viscosity petroleum stocks which comprises subjecting the high viscosity stock to solvent extraction■ for the extration of constituents undesirable in a lubricating oil and to mild thermal-catalytic cracking at a temperature of about 600°-800° F.” “7. The method of producing stabilized low viscosity lubricating oils from relatively high viscosity petroleum stocks which comprises subjecting the high viscosity stock to mild thermahcatalytic cracking at a temperature of about 600°-800° F. and subsequently subjecting the cracked stock to solvent extraction for the extraction of constituents’ undesirable in a lubricating oil.” “12. The method of producing stabilized low viscosity lubricating oils from relatively high viscosity petroleum stock which comprises subjecting the high viscosity stock to mild thermal-catalytic cracking at a temperature of about 600°-800° F., subsequently subjecting the cracked stock to solvent extraction for the extraction of constituents undesirable in a lubricating oil, subjecting the cracked and extracted stock to contact with a bleaching earth at a subcracking temperature, and transferring the spent bleaching earth from the lower temperature contact operation to the higher temperature thermal catalytic cracking.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Martin