Bowles v. Quon’s Empirical Analysis
154 F.2d 72 · 1946
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1980
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rogers v. Hill · National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Thompson · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sunbeam Gold Mines Co. · Williams Iron Works Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. · Murray Hill Restaurant, Inc. v. Thirteen Twenty One Locust, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An abuse of discretion is a plain error, discretion exercised to an end not justified by the evidence, a judgment that is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts as are found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.